Skip to main content
Glama
TylerIlunga

Procore MCP Server

Get All Job Titles In The Company

get_all_job_titles_in_the_company
Read-onlyIdempotent

Fetch all job titles for a company to manage resource planning records. Requires a company ID.

Instructions

Returns an array of all Job Titles within the specified company. Use this to fetch the full details of a specific Resource Planning records by its identifier. Returns a JSON object describing the requested Resource Planning records. Required parameters: company_id. Procore API: Resource Management > Resource Planning. Endpoint: GET /rest/v1.0/workforce-planning/v2/companies/{company_id}/job-titles

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
company_idYesURL path parameter — unique identifier for the company. This parameter accepts both formats: - **Recommended**: Procore company ID (integer) - Use this for new integrations - Legacy: LaborChart UUID format (uuid string...
pageNoPage number for paginated results (default: 1)
per_pageNoNumber of items per page (default: 100, max: 100)
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, providing safety. The description adds no new behavioral insights beyond the endpoint and API context, which is adequate but not exceptional.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is relatively short but includes unnecessary and confusing statements about specific records, which detracts from clarity and conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple list tool with annotations, the description covers basic functionality but lacks clarity on pagination and response structure (array vs object inconsistency). The endpoint context is helpful.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so parameters are well-documented there. The description only restates the required parameter, adding no new semantic value beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it returns all job titles for a company, but then contradicts itself by mentioning fetching a specific record and returning a JSON object describing requested records, causing confusion.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs siblings like get_a_single_job_title or get_all_job_titles_belonging_to_a_group. The misleading statement about fetching a specific record adds to the confusion.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/TylerIlunga/procore-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server