Delete Company Action Plan Type

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint and idempotentHint. Description repeats 'permanently delete' and 'cannot be undone,' reinforcing the destructive nature but adding little beyond annotations. It includes API endpoint info which is helpful but not behavioral.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is short but contains redundancy ('permanently delete' and 'cannot be undone' are each stated twice). Front-loading is adequate, but redundant sentences reduce efficiency.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple delete tool with annotations and a clear schema, the description covers the essential purpose and parameters. However, it does not address potential side effects (e.g., cascading deletes) or constraints, leaving some gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and description only restates required parameters without adding meaning beyond what the schema already provides. Baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it deletes a company action plan type and specifies it permanently removes action plans. Distinguishes from sibling tools like create, update, list, and show, which are available in the server.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Indicates the tool is for permanent deletion but does not explicitly state when to use it versus alternatives, nor does it provide exclusion criteria. The irreversibility is emphasized, but no comparative guidance is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.