Delete Action Plan Section

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true, and the description reinforces that deletion is permanent and cannot be undone. This adds some context but does not disclose additional behavioral traits such as authorization requirements or effects on related data. The description mostly echoes the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is somewhat verbose with repetition (e.g., 'permanently delete' and 'cannot be undone' each appear twice). It could be more concise. The inclusion of API endpoint details is extra but not necessarily harmful. Overall, it is adequate but not streamlined.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description misstates the target resource (Action Plans vs. Action Plan Sections), which is a significant gap. It does not explain what happens to associated items or provide any post-deletion context. Given no output schema, the description should offer more completeness but falls short.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 100% description coverage for both parameters. The description merely lists the required parameters, adding no new semantics beyond what the schema provides. No additional constraints, formats, or relationships are described.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it deletes 'Action Plan Sections,' but repeatedly says 'delete the specified Action Plans,' which misidentifies the resource. While the action (permanent deletion) is clear, the confusion between section and plan reduces clarity. It does not explicitly distinguish from the sibling tool 'delete_action_plan.'

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'delete_action_plan.' It does not specify prerequisites, conditions, or exclusions. The only context is the required parameters.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.