Create BIM Model Revision Plan

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate the tool is not read-only (readOnlyHint=false) and not destructive. The description adds that it returns the created object on success (HTTP 201), providing some behavioral insight, but lacks details on authentication, rate limits, or error handling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is relatively short but contains redundancy (e.g., 'Use this to create a new BIM records' and 'Creates a new BIM records'). It is front-loaded with the main action but could be more streamlined.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of an output schema and the open-world nature of the 'bim_model_revision_plan' parameter, the description does not provide enough guidance on expected fields or constraints. It leaves the agent uncertain about what to include in the request body.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% as both parameters have descriptions. The description repeats the required parameters but does not add new meaning beyond what the schema provides, such as the structure or allowed values of the 'bim_model_revision_plan' object.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool creates a relationship between a BIM Model Revision and a BIM Plan, and mentions it creates a new BIM record. However, it does not distinguish from the sibling tool 'create_a_batch_of_bim_model_revision_plans' which creates multiple records, missing a chance to differentiate single vs batch creation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides basic usage context ('Use this to create a new BIM records') but offers no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like the batch creation sibling. There are no explicit when-not-to-use instructions or comparisons.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.