List Workflow Presets (Project)

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint true, destructiveHint false, idempotentHint true, openWorldHint true. The description adds that it returns a paginated JSON array with metadata and provides the API endpoint. This goes beyond annotations by specifying return format and pagination behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise (4 sentences), starts with the core purpose, and each sentence adds value (purpose, use cases, pagination info, required params, API reference). No redundant or filler content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description specifies the return type (paginated JSON array with metadata). It also provides the endpoint and API version, which helps the agent understand the tool's context. It could mention typical fields in the response object, but the current level is sufficient for a list tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so each parameter is documented in the schema. The description reinforces pagination parameters and lists required params but adds limited new meaning beyond the schema's parameter descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists workflow presets for a project, providing paginated overview, ID finding, and filtering. It differentiates from company-level sibling via 'Project' in title and description, but does not explicitly distinguish from other project-level siblings like get_workflow_preset_project or update_workflow_preset_project.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It tells when to use (enumerate workflows, find IDs, filter) and specifies required parameters. However, it does not indicate when not to use (e.g., for a single preset use get_workflow_preset_project) or provide explicit alternative tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.