Retrieve A Note By Id In The Project

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate read-only, non-destructive, idempotent, open-world. Description adds that it returns a JSON object and provides the API endpoint (GET), but does not disclose additional behaviors like pagination or response structure beyond what annotations imply. Does not contradict annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is three sentences, front-loaded with purpose, no redundant sentences. Includes essential endpoint and required parameters without fluff. Efficiently structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple retrieval tool with annotations, description covers purpose, return type, and required inputs. Schema covers optional parameters. Missing element: no explicit mention of pagination parameters, but they are in schema. Overall adequate for an agent to use correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 100% coverage with descriptions for all 5 parameters. Description lists required parameters (note_id, company_id, bid_board_project_id) but adds no new meaning beyond schema. Optional parameters (page, per_page) are omitted from description. Baseline 3 is appropriate as schema carries the semantic burden.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Retrieve a note by Id' with resource and action. It specifies fetching details of Bid Board records, but does not explicitly differentiate from sibling 'retrieve_a_note_by_id_in_the_project_company' (likely v1). Purpose is clear but sibling distinction is implicit via version suffix.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

States 'Use this to fetch the full details of a specific Bid Board records by its identifier,' indicating when to use. However, no guidance on when not to use or alternatives (e.g., listing notes vs. retrieving a single note). Context is clear but lacks exclusion criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.