Bulk Update Work Activities

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false (modifying) and destructiveHint=false. The description adds that only supplied fields are changed (PATCH behavior) and returns the modified object, but these are not significant beyond annotations. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with two main sentences plus a required parameter note and API reference. It is well-structured and front-loaded, though the 'Incidents' reference causes minor confusion.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the basic action, partial update, and return value, but lacks details on batch limits, error handling, or specific use cases. For a bulk operation with no output schema, it is adequate but not fully comprehensive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the parameters are already described. The description only highlights company_id as required (already in schema) and does not add meaningful detail about 'ids' or 'active' beyond the schema. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it updates multiple Work Activities in one request, using a specific verb and resource. However, it confusingly mentions 'Incidents' instead of consistently referring to Work Activities, which slightly detracts from clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides minimal guidance on when to use this tool, only stating to use it to update existing items. It does not mention alternatives (e.g., singular update) or when not to use it, which is insufficient for tool selection among many bulk_update siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.