Create Submittal Response

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate it's not readOnly, not destructive, and not idempotent. The description adds the HTTP 201 response and endpoint, but misstates the created resource as 'Submittals' instead of 'Submittal Response'. No additional behavioral context beyond creation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description has redundancy (first two sentences repeat similar info) and an inaccuracy. It includes useful API details but could be more concise and consistent.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple create tool with no output schema, the description explains the HTTP response and endpoint but does not elaborate on the domain context (what a Submittal Response is, the 'considered' mapping). Slightly incomplete for a fully self-contained definition.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for all three parameters. The description merely lists required parameters without adding new meaning. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the tool creates a Submittal Response for a project, but refers to 'new Submittals' inconsistently, which could cause confusion with the sibling tool 'create_submittal'. The purpose is mostly clear but has a significant inaccuracy.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'create_submittal'. No when-not-to-use or context provided beyond the basic action.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.