set_tpa_mode

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, but description discloses the behavioral effect (attenuating specific terms) and lists all possible values and default. Lacks mention of side effects or safety implications.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: two sentences with front-loaded verb and resource, followed by a clear bullet-like list of options. No redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple single-parameter tool, description is nearly complete. Could mention that tpa_mode affects PID behavior or safety considerations, but not strictly necessary among siblings.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% but schema description is minimal ('Value for tpa_mode (UINT8)'). Description adds significant meaning by mapping enum values to actual term attenuation and specifying default, which the schema lacks.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the verb 'Set' and resource 'tpa_mode', defines what tpa_mode does (which terms TPA attenuates), and distinguishes from siblings like set_tpa_rate by naming specific values D, PD, PDS.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when-to-use or alternatives; usage is implied by the context of configuring TPA mode, but no guidance compared to other set_* tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.