set_auto_disarm_delay

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description bears the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states that the tool sets a parameter and explains the value's meaning, but lacks information on side effects (e.g., requires reboot, affects arming). It provides the range and default, which is acceptable but not comprehensive for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, consisting of two short sentences. It front-loads the action and critical information (meaning, range, default) without any superfluous content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (single integer parameter, no nested objects, no output schema), the description is fairly complete. It includes the meaning, range, and default. However, it could mention the return behavior or confirm if a reboot is needed, which would make it fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already covers the parameter with 100% description coverage. The description adds value by explaining that the value represents seconds of throttle-zero and that 0 disables, going beyond the schema's simple label. This enriches the agent's understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly specifies the verb 'Set' and the resource 'auto_disarm_delay', defines its function (throttle-zero seconds before auto-disarm), and notes the special case of 0 disabling it. This distinctly identifies the tool among many set_ siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., the corresponding get_auto_disarm_delay tool). There is no mention of prerequisites such as needing a connected flight controller or the appropriate operational state (e.g., disarmed).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.