set_rc_smoothing_throttle_cutoff

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden of disclosing behavior. It indicates this is a setter (mutation), mentions the default value (0), and that 0 enables auto mode. However, it does not describe any side effects, persistence behavior, or required permissions. As a simple parameter setter, the disclosure is minimal but not contradictory.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence but includes a redundant repetition of the tool name ('Set rc_smoothing_throttle_cutoff:'). It then provides the key information concisely. It could be more efficient by removing the re-statement, but it remains short and to the point.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description covers the essential semantics: it sets a throttle smoothing cutoff, with zero meaning auto. However, it lacks explanation of what the parameter does in practice or valid ranges beyond zero. It is adequate but not richly complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema describes the parameter with type integer and a brief label, but the description adds significant meaning: '0 = use auto' and the default value. This clarifies the special semantics of zero as a mode selector, which is not apparent from the schema alone. Schema coverage is 100%, but the description enhances understanding beyond the label.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states this tool sets the rc_smoothing_throttle_cutoff parameter, which is a manual throttle smoothing cutoff. It explicitly contrasts with '0 = use auto', distinguishing it from the automatic mode. Among siblings, it is one of many set_* tools, but the specific parameter name and description make its purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a hint that a value of 0 means 'use auto', but does not explicitly explain when to use this tool versus alternatives like set_rc_smoothing or when a non-zero value is appropriate. It lacks explicit usage context or prerequisites, though the default value and auto mode hint are useful.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.