get_tpa_mode

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description should disclose behavioral traits. It does not mention that this is a read-only operation, whether it might fail, or any prerequisites. The agent must infer it's a safe read based on the name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: one line naming the tool, one line for purpose, and a clear enumeration of values. No superfluous words. The key information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple getter with no parameters and no output schema, the description is quite complete. It explains the meaning of the returned value and possible options. However, it lacks any note on when this setting is relevant or how it interacts with other TPA-related tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0 parameters with 100% coverage. The description adds value beyond the schema by explaining the meaning of the return values (e.g., 'D' = D only, default safest) and the default value. This helps the agent interpret the result correctly.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the purpose: retrieving the TPA mode and explaining what each possible value means. It distinguishes from sibling 'set_tpa_mode' by being a getter, and the enumeration of values ('D', 'PD', 'PDS') makes the output interpretable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this vs. other getters or settings. The name and context imply it's a straightforward config read, but no when-not-to-use or alternative tools are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.