get_ez_landing_limit

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses the read-only nature ('Get'), precise value constraints (UINT8, 0-75, default 15), and that it is per-profile. For a simple parameter retrieval, this is transparent and sufficient. Missing mention of connection state or side effects is acceptable for such a narrow tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that front-loads the action ('Get ez_landing_limit') and immediately provides essential details (type, range, default). Every word adds value; no redundancy. Ideal conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description explains what the tool returns (the limit value) but does not specify the response format (e.g., integer, string). However, the data type hint 'UINT8' implicitly suggests a numeric return. For a simple getter, this is nearly complete; minor omission of explicit output description keeps it from a 5.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters with 100% schema coverage (empty schema). Baseline is 4, and the description correctly adds no param info since none exist. No improvement needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves the 'ez_landing_limit' parameter, defines it as 'minimum throttle floor enforced by EZ landing (%)', and provides data type, range, and default. This is specific and unambiguous, distinguishing it from sibling getters like get_ez_landing_speed or get_ez_landing_threshold through unique parameter identity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use or avoid this tool vs. alternatives. As a simple getter for a specific parameter, usage is implied: use when needing the current EZ landing limit value. No comparisons to siblings or exclusions are provided, but the niche scope makes this adequate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.