get_scheduler_debug_task

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided. The 'Get' prefix implies a read-only operation, but the description does not explicitly state safety or side effects. It adds context about the return value but lacks behavioral detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short (three sentences) but the first sentence redundantly repeats the tool name. Efficient overall with minimal waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple getter with no parameters or output schema, the description covers purpose, usage, and return type. Lacks mention of the setter counterpart but is fairly complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has no parameters, so baseline is 4. The description adds return value info '[UINT16, default: 0]', providing semantics beyond the empty schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves a task index used in scheduler debug output for per-task timing analysis. The verb 'Get' and resource 'scheduler_debug_task' are specific, and it distinguishes from the sibling 'set_scheduler_debug_task'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It specifies usage for per-task timing analysis, but does not provide when not to use or mention alternatives like the setter counterpart. The guidance is implied but not explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.