set_dyn_idle_i_gain

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden but only states the action and type. It does not disclose behavioral traits such as whether the change is immediate, persistent, or has any side effects. The description adds minimal value beyond the action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: one sentence with embedded type, range, and default in brackets. Every word is necessary and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

As a simple setter with a well-defined parameter, the description is minimally adequate. However, it lacks context on the effect of the setting, any prerequisites, or confirmation of success. For a tool with no output schema, this additional context would be beneficial.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already provides full coverage (100%) for the single parameter 'value' with description, type, and range. The description adds a default value ('default: 50') not present in the schema, which is useful for the agent.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Set' and resource 'dyn_idle_i_gain', and explains its role as the 'I gain of the dynamic idle RPM controller'. It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like set_dyn_idle_d_gain and set_dyn_idle_p_gain by specifying the gain type.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives or any conditions. As a simple setter among many similar parameters, the lack of usage context leaves the agent uninformed about selection rationale.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.