get_crash_delay

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries full burden. It discloses the return value type (UINT16), range (0–500), and default (0 per profile). However, it omits behavioral details like read-only nature (implied by 'get') and whether the value is per-profile or global, leaving minor ambiguity.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: one sentence plus bracketed constraints. Front-loaded with the tool name and explanation, no wasted words. Every part earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description explains the return value and its context well. Missing explicit units (likely milliseconds), but range and purpose provide sufficient completeness for a simple getter.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0 parameters and 100% schema coverage, baseline is 4. The description adds meaning by explaining the return value's purpose and constraints, exceeding the schema's empty definition.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's verb ('Get'), resource ('crash_delay'), and explains its meaning as 'Delay after arm before crash detection is armed.' It provides range and default, distinguishing it from other crash-related getters like get_crash_dthreshold.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

For a simple getter, usage is implied but no explicit guidance on when to use vs. alternatives (e.g., set_crash_delay). The description lacks exclusions or context about when this tool is appropriate, earning a mid-range score.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.