set_simplified_master_multiplier

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Describes the effect (scales P,I,D,Dmax) and default, but does not mention persistence, live application, or side effects. With no annotations, more behavioral detail would be helpful.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with key info front-loaded. No wasted words, includes range hint and default.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequate for a simple setter with one parameter. Explains what the parameter does and its default. Lacks mention of whether changes take effect immediately or require reboot, but overall sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% but description adds significant context: master gain slider, scales all PID, default 100, equivalent to PIDtoolbox Master Multiplier. This goes beyond the schema's minimal description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it sets the simplified master multiplier, a master gain that scales all P, I, D, and D_max together. Distinguishes from sibling tools like set_simplified_d_gain by indicating it's a global scale.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies use when you want to scale all PID gains uniformly, and default of 100 indicates neutral value. But does not explicitly state when to prefer this over individual gain setters or when not to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.