get_tpa_speed_adv_thrust

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It indicates the tool is a getter returning a UINT16 value with a default. It lacks details on side effects, read-only nature, or communication overhead, but for a simple parameter getter this is adequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise line that includes the purpose, prerequisite, and data type. It slightly redundantly repeats the tool name but is otherwise well-structured and free of unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has no parameters, no output schema, and no nested objects, the description provides essential information (return type, default, requirement). It is complete for this simple getter tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has no parameters, so schema coverage is 100%. The description adds context about the return type and default, which is useful. With zero parameters, a baseline of 4 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves the maximum thrust in grams for the advanced speed TPA physics model, with a specific prerequisite (USE_WING) and data type (UINT16). This distinguishes it from related siblings like get_tpa_speed_basic_delay.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly mentions the requirement `USE_WING`, guiding the agent on when to use this tool. It does not provide when-not-to-use or compare to alternatives, but the requirement is a clear usage condition.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.