set_iterm_relax

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It explains the basic function (setting axes for I-term relaxation) but lacks details on persistence, side effects, or whether changes take effect immediately or require a reboot. The mention of 'UINT8' in the description may also conflict with the schema's 'string' type.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, consisting of one self-contained sentence followed by brief clarifications. It is front-loaded with the primary action and resource, and every part serves a purpose without superfluous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description provides adequate context but lacks some completeness. It does not mention default value implications or how this setting interacts with other I-term relaxation parameters. For a more complex context, additional guidance would be needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but the description adds significant value beyond the schema. It interprets the single parameter 'value' by explaining the meaningful options ('RP' and 'RPY') and their effects on axes. This helps an agent generate correct parameter values beyond the schema's minimal description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Set' and the resource 'iterm_relax', explaining that it controls which axes have I-term relaxation (anti-windup) active. It provides specific meanings for values like 'RP' (roll and pitch) and 'RPY' (includes yaw). While it doesn't explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like set_iterm_relax_type, the purpose is clear and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., set_iterm_relax_type or set_iterm_relax_cutoff). Usage context is implied by the function (setting axes for anti-windup), but no when-not-to-use or prerequisite conditions are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.