set_max_aux_channels

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states the setting action and the type/default, but omits side effects, persistence, whether changes take effect immediately or require reboot, or valid range despite mentioning UINT8.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, with no unnecessary words. The key information is front-loaded ('Set max_aux_channels') followed by the meaning and parameter details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple setter with one parameter, the description covers the purpose, type, and default. It lacks explicit range validation but is otherwise sufficient. The absence of an output schema is acceptable for a setter.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is high (parameter has a description), but the description adds the default value (14) and the UINT8 type hint, which provides extra context beyond the schema. It could be improved by explicitly stating the valid range (0-255).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Set') and the resource ('max_aux_channels'), and explains what it controls ('Maximum number of AUX channels processed'). This is unambiguous and distinguishes it from its getter sibling tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as the corresponding getter tool or other setter tools. There are no prerequisites, context, or exclusions mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.