get_blackbox_disable_pids

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are absent, so the description carries the burden. It implies a read operation and hints at the value type ('[UINT32, default: OFF]'), but does not explicitly state no side effects or how the returned value is structured. For a simple getter, this is adequate but not thorough.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is exceptionally concise: two short sentences plus a type annotation. It front-loads the action and resource, with no wasted words. Every part serves a clear purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the basic purpose and value type, but lacks details on whether the UINT32 is a boolean flag or bitmask, and does not mention that this is a read-only configuration parameter. For a zero-parameter tool with no output schema, it is minimally complete but leaves some ambiguity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has no parameters with 100% schema coverage. The description adds context by stating the returned value type (UINT32) and default (OFF), which helps an agent understand what the tool returns. This exceeds the baseline expectation for a no-parameter tool.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool gets the 'blackbox_disable_pids' setting and explains its purpose (exclude PID data from logs, reduce log size). It differentiates from siblings through the specific parameter name but does not explicitly contrast with other get_blackbox_disable_* tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., other get_blackbox_disable_* tools or set_blackbox_disable_pids). The description only explains what the tool does, not the context for its use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.