get_tpa_speed_basic_delay

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must carry the burden of behavioral disclosure. It correctly indicates this is a read operation ('Get') and explains the parameter's role, but does not disclose side effects or safety. The default value is mentioned, which adds some transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: two sentences plus a requirement and type/default annotation. Every component serves a purpose, with no redundancy or wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool is a simple getter with no parameters and no output schema, the description fully covers what the parameter is, its unit, default, and prerequisite. It is complete for the tool's complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0 parameters, so schema coverage is 100% trivially. The description adds value beyond the schema by specifying the type (UINT16) and default value (1000), which are not present in the schema. Baseline for 0 params with high coverage is 3, but the added details justify a 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it gets a specific parameter (tpa_speed_basic_delay) and explains its function: delay in ms before speed-based TPA updates after a speed change. This distinguishes it from other getters in the sibling list by providing a unique, specific purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description notes a prerequisite (requires USE_WING) but provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., the setter or other getters). There is no explicit context for when to invoke it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.