get_simplified_pids_mode

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It describes the return format (UINT8, default: RPY) which adds value beyond the schema. However, it does not disclose any behavioral traits such as side effects, idempotency, or rate limits. For a simple read operation, the description is minimally transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, consisting of two sentences that front-load the purpose and then explain the meaning of the return value. Every part is relevant and there is no waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no parameters and no output schema, the description is fairly complete. It explains what the tool gets and the default value. However, it does not fully enumerate possible values (e.g., other axis combinations) or describe the output structure in detail. For a simple getter, it is adequate but not comprehensive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters in the input schema, and schema description coverage is 100% (no params to describe). The baseline for zero parameters is 4. The description adds meaning by explaining the tool's purpose and the return value format, which goes beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves which axes the simplified PID sliders control, using the verb 'get' and specifying the resource. It explains that 'RPY = all axes', but does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like get_pid_sliders or other get_simplified_* tools. The purpose is clear but lacks sibling differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention when-not-to-use, prerequisites, or contrast with similar getter or setter tools. The presence of set_simplified_pids_mode implies this is for reading, but no explicit usage context is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.