set_dshot_edt

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses the FORCE option behavior and default state (OFF), but does not mention side effects, whether changes take effect immediately, or any safety implications. Some behavioral context is added beyond the schema, but gaps remain.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief with two sentences plus a parenthetical note. It is front-loaded with the key purpose and includes essential details without unnecessary words. Could be slightly more structured, but it is concise and informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple setter with one parameter and no output schema, the description covers purpose, parameter semantics, and requirements. It does not explain return values or post-setting behavior, but for a configuration tool this is adequate. Missing some context like immediate effect persistence.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single 'value' parameter has 100% schema coverage. The description adds meaning by explaining the UINT8 type, default OFF, and the special FORCE value that enables EDT when bidir is off. This provides useful context beyond the parameter's schema description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Set' and the resource 'dshot_edt', and explains its purpose as 'Extended DSHOT Telemetry — provides additional ESC data beyond RPM.' However, it does not explicitly distinguish this from its sibling 'get_dshot_edt' or other set tools, though the function is self-evident.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description includes requirements (`USE_DSHOT` + `USE_DSHOT_TELEMETRY`) and mentions the special FORCE value. It does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives, but the context of setting a configuration parameter is implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.