get_gyro_lpf1_dyn_max_hz

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description fully discloses it is a read operation ('Get') and provides the data type and default. No contradictory or misleading information; the tool's behavior as a simple parameter getter is transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that includes the core purpose and technical details (type, default) in a compact format. Every part is meaningful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple getter with no parameters and no output schema, the description provides all necessary information: what is retrieved, its type, and default. The agent can invoke it correctly without additional context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has no parameters, and the input schema is empty, so no parameter description is needed. The schema coverage is 100%, and the description provides relevant context about the return value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves the 'Dynamic LPF1 maximum cutoff (at full throttle)', which is a specific and distinct resource among many getters for gyro and other parameters. It includes type [UINT16] and default value, making it unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_gyro_lpf1_dyn_min_hz or get_gyro_lpf1_static_hz. However, the name and brief description imply it is for querying the maximum cutoff, so usage is implied but not explicitly differentiated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.