set_d_max_pitch

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description mentions UINT8 and default value, which adds some behavioral info, but it contradicts the schema's allowed range (schema allows negative and very large numbers, while description says UINT8, which is 0-255). No annotations are provided to compensate for the lack of behavioral disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short line with no unnecessary words. It would benefit from better structure (e.g., separating name and details), but it is highly efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tuning parameter in a flight controller, the description lacks context about the role of d_max_pitch, how it affects behavior, or any warnings. It covers only the basic purpose and type.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% with a description for the value parameter. The tool description adds the default value (46), which is useful but does not significantly extend the schema's explanation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it sets the d_max_pitch parameter for pitch. It specifies the data type (UINT8) and default value (46), which distinguishes it from sibling tools like set_d_max_roll or set_d_max_yaw.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage: call this tool to set the d_max_pitch value. However, it provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it mention any prerequisites or side effects.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.