get_blackbox_disable_bat

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It only states 'Get ... Exclude battery data,' implying a read operation, but does not explicitly confirm non-destructiveness, authentication needs, or any side effects. The minimal text fails to fully inform an agent about expected behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short—a single line with a type hint. It front-loads the tool name and core action. While concise, it omits some useful details (like return format), but for a simple parameterless getter, it avoids unnecessary verbiage.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no parameters, no output schema, and many similar siblings, the description explains 'Exclude battery data' and provides type/default info. However, it does not clarify the exact return format (e.g., 0/1 or ON/OFF), nor does it link to related settings. It is minimally complete but leaves gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The description adds value by including '[UINT32, default: OFF]', which hints at the type and default of the returned value. This provides context beyond the empty schema, though it pertains to the output rather than input parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get blackbox_disable_bat: Exclude battery data.' This directly indicates the tool retrieves the configuration setting for excluding battery data from blackbox logging. Among many similar sibling tools for different data types, this one is specific to battery, making its purpose distinct.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No instructions are given on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, nor any contrast with the numerous sibling getters (e.g., get_blackbox_disable_acc, etc.). The agent receives no guidance on selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.