set_blackbox_disable_gyrounfilt

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden. It discloses the basic action (set to exclude unfiltered gyro data) but omits behavioral traits such as whether changes persist, require reboot, or affect flight performance. Minimal transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with an appended type/default hint. It is concise and front-loaded, with no redundant information. The structure could be slightly improved by integrating the default more naturally.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple boolean setter with full schema coverage and no output schema, the description covers the basic purpose. However, it lacks broader context such as the effect on blackbox logging or relation to other blackbox disable settings. Adequate but not thorough.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the description adds the purpose ('exclude unfiltered gyro data') and default value ('OFF'). While the schema already enumerates values, the description provides context but could clarify the effect of each state. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool sets a parameter to exclude unfiltered gyro data from blackbox logging. It uses a specific verb+resource pattern and the name helps differentiate from sibling setters like set_blackbox_disable_gyro, though no explicit comparison is made.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites, conditions, or limitations. The description only states what it does, leaving the agent to infer usage context from the name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.