set_rate_6pos_switch

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must fully disclose behavior. It mentions type UINT8 and default OFF, but fails to clarify valid values (e.g., 0/1 or 0-5) or the effect of enabling the switch. The term 'Enable' is ambiguous given the 6-position context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence with a parenthetical note about type and default. Every part is relevant, though it could be slightly more structured for clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool (one parameter, no output schema), the description should be complete. It lacks specification of valid parameter values and how the AUX channel maps to the 6-position selection, leaving critical gaps for correct usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, baseline is 3. The description adds context (enable via AUX channel, default OFF) but does not resolve ambiguity about valid values for the 'value' parameter, creating potential confusion.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (Set/Enable) and resource (rate_6pos_switch) with a specific purpose: enabling 6-position rate profile selection via an AUX channel. It distinguishes itself from sibling getter get_rate_6pos_switch and other set_* tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage (enable via AUX channel) but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like set_rate_profile or other switch-related settings. No exclusions or conditions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.