get_blackbox_disable_alt

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the burden. It states the setting's exclusion purpose and type info, but does not disclose that it is a read-only operation with no side effects. Minimal transparency beyond the tool name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise (one sentence) but lacks structure. It could be improved by front-loading the key information, but it is not overly verbose. Adequate but not exemplary.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema is provided, and the description does not explain the return value format (e.g., 0 or 1). It only mentions the type and default, leaving the agent to infer the exact output. Lacks completeness for a simple tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has no parameters, so description adds no parameter information. According to the rubric, zero parameters yields a baseline of 4, which is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Exclude altitude data' combined with the tool name clearly indicates this retrieves the blackbox altitude exclusion setting. It is specific and distinguishable from sibling tools like get_blackbox_disable_acc, but could be more explicit about returning the current state.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Given the many sibling get_blackbox_disable_* tools, it would help to state that this is used to check if altitude logging is disabled, but no such context is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.