get_failsafe_stick_threshold

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the burden. It discloses the data type, range, and default value, which are behavioral aspects of the returned parameter. However, it does not state whether this is a read-only operation or any other traits like idempotency. The lack of such info is acceptable for a simple getter.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: two sentences plus a bracket note. It front-loads the tool name and key definition, then provides contextual usage. Every sentence adds necessary information without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple getter with no parameters and no output schema, the description covers all needed information: what the tool returns, the meaning, the range, and the context of use. It is complete and leaves no gaps for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are no parameters, so the schema is fully covered. The description adds value by explaining the meaning of the threshold (degrees from center) and its range/default, which goes beyond the empty schema. Baseline for zero parameters is 4, and the description meets that.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves the failsafe_stick_threshold value, defines it as stick deflection required to exit GPS Rescue Stage 2, and provides actionable context (move sticks to this threshold after signal recovery). It is distinct from many sibling getter tools by specifying the exact parameter and its role.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implicitly says when to use: to obtain the threshold needed for exiting GPS Rescue Stage 2. It does not explicitly mention alternatives or when not to use, but the usage is self-evident for a getter. The contextual instruction 'Move sticks to this threshold...' adds practical guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.