set_rx_min_usec

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It explains that values below the threshold trigger signal-loss detection, but does not mention whether the change persists, requires a save, or if there are any side effects. The default value is helpful.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise at 19 words, front-loaded with the action, and efficiently communicates the purpose and effect in a single sentence with bracketed metadata.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple setter tool with one parameter, the description covers the purpose, effect, and default. It does not explicitly mention units (usec is implied) or the existence of a getter companion, but overall it is sufficient for an AI agent to understand and invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already describes the parameter as 'Value for rx_min_usec (UINT16)' with a range. The description adds meaning by linking the value to signal-loss detection and providing the default. This goes beyond the schema's minimal description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool sets the shortest channel pulse width considered valid, explains its role in signal-loss detection, and includes the default value. This distinguishes it from similar tools like set_rx_max_usec.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like set_rx_max_usec or other set_* tools. It does not mention prerequisites or scenarios where adjusting this parameter is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.