get_gyro_lpf1_dyn_min_hz

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It states 'Get' which implies a read-only operation, and provides type/default info. However, it does not explicitly disclose that it has no side effects or require permissions. The transparency is adequate but could be more explicit.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise: one clear sentence plus a parenthetical hint and type/default. Information is front-loaded with the verb and resource. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple getter with no parameters or output schema, the description provides the purpose, a usage hint, and type/default. However, it does not explain the return value format or units beyond 'Hz' implied. Mostly complete for the context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has no parameters (0), and schema description coverage is 100%. Baseline for 0 parameters is 4. The description adds no parameter info because none exist, which is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get gyro_lpf1_dyn_min_hz: Dynamic LPF1 minimum cutoff (at low throttle)' which specifies the verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like get_gyro_lpf1_dyn_max_hz and get_gyro_lpf1_static_hz by mentioning 'minimum' and 'at low throttle', and provides a hint about static mode usage.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description includes a usage tip ('Set equal to gyro_lpf1_static_hz to use static mode') but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives among the many gyro-related getters. The context is implied but not fully clarified.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.