get_reboot_character

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions the character triggers a reboot when sent to the FC, which hints at the significance, but does not explicitly state that this is a read-only getter with no side effects. The type and range information is helpful but could go further.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description consists of two short sentences that front-load the purpose. It is mostly efficient, though the default value is mentioned twice ('default: R' and then the numeric default 82). This slight redundancy prevents a perfect score, but overall it is clear and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description lacks an explicit statement about the return value format (e.g., returns a single character or a string). It also does not mention that this is a configurable setting linked to set_reboot_character. Given no output schema, more detail on the output would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters, so the description has no parameter information to add. With 0 parameters and 100% schema coverage, the baseline is 4. The description effectively explains what the tool does without needing parameter details.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get reboot_character: ASCII character that triggers a reboot...' which combines a specific verb ('Get') with a specific resource ('reboot_character') and explains its purpose. Among many getters, this one is uniquely identifiable. The inclusion of the default value and range further clarifies the resource.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implicitly indicates read-only retrieval via the verb 'Get', and the sibling set_reboot_character exists for writing. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives or any prerequisites. The context of many getters/setters provides indirect guidance, but explicit usage notes are missing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.