set_simplified_i_gain

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses type (UINT8) and default value (100), adding value beyond the schema, but does not mention side effects, persistence, or whether changes take effect immediately; adequate for a simple setter.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise single sentence with bracketed type/default, front-loading purpose and critical info with zero filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequate for a simple parameter setter; covers purpose, type, and default, but could benefit from brief context on how this fits into PID tuning or that it modifies flight controller settings.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a description for the parameter; tool description adds the default value, providing additional context beyond the schema, justifying a score above baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool sets the simplified I gain, describes it as an 'I scaling slider' and explicitly notes it is 'independent of P,' distinguishing it from related siblings like set_simplified_pi_gain.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies usage through 'independent of P,' suggesting this tool adjusts I gain without affecting P, but lacks explicit when-to-use or alternative guidance compared to siblings like set_simplified_pi_gain.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.