set_dterm_notch_cutoff

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must disclose behavioral traits but only gives the type and default value. It does not indicate whether the setting takes effect immediately, requires a save or reboot, or has any side effects on other settings.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, using a single sentence to convey the purpose, type, and default. It is front-loaded and easily scanned. However, it could be slightly more structured with separate sentences for different aspects.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple setter with one parameter, the description omits important context such as units, accepted range (though schematically defined), whether the setting requires a reboot, and its effect on flight dynamics. This leaves the agent underinformed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with the parameter description already stating 'Value for dterm_notch_cutoff (UINT16)'. The description redundantly includes the type and default, adding little new meaning. A 3 is appropriate as the description confirms but does not enrich beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it sets dterm_notch_cutoff and explains it as 'Static D-term notch bandwidth'. The verb 'Set' matches the tool's function and distinguishes it from getter counterparts. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from other dterm-related setters like set_dterm_notch_hz, but the parameter name is unique enough.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when to adjust notch bandwidth versus notch frequency or other filter parameters. No mention of prerequisites or typical use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.