get_rc_smoothing_throttle_cutoff

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description adds value by specifying the data type (UINT8) and default (0), plus the meaning of 0. However, it does not mention any side effects or prerequisites, though for a simple read this is acceptable.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no filler, front-loaded with the verb and resource, and every part adds useful information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a parameterless getter, the description fully covers what it does, the meaning of the value, and the format. No missing information given the tool's simplicity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are no parameters in the schema, but the description explains the semantics of the returned value (manual cutoff, 0=auto), compensating for the lack of output schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves the 'Manual throttle smoothing cutoff' value and explains that 0 means use auto. It distinguishes from sibling get_rc_smoothing_* tools by naming the specific parameter.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_rc_smoothing or set_rc_smoothing_throttle_cutoff. The description implies it is for reading the throttle cutoff, but lacks explicit context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.