set_failsafe_landing_time

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses the parameter's type, range, and default but does not mention side effects, prerequisites (e.g., connection state), or whether changes are immediately applied. Minimal transparency beyond schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is highly concise: one sentence expressing purpose followed by a compact technical spec. Every element (name, range, default, unit) is essential, and it is front-loaded with the action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and no annotations, the description is adequate for a simple setter but lacks broader context such as when it is safe to use, any dependencies, or whether it triggers a save/reboot. The tool is part of a large set of similar setters, so the description is standard but not exceptional.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline 3. The description adds value by clarifying the default value (60) and interpreting it as 6 seconds, which is not in the schema. This helps the agent understand the unit and typical setting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool sets the duration of Landing Mode (AUTO-LAND) Stage 2. It includes the data type (UINT8), valid range (0-250), and default value (60 corresponding to 6 seconds). This specificity distinguishes it from sibling tools like set_failsafe_delay.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for configuring failsafe landing behavior but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives. No exclusions or contextual cues are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.