get_pid_at_min_throttle

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

In the absence of annotations, the description adequately explains the behavior: it retrieves a setting that keeps PIDs active at idle. The type and default are noted. However, it does not explicitly state that the operation is read-only, though this is inferred from 'Get'.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, using a single sentence plus technical details in brackets. It front-loads the purpose and includes no redundant words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple 0-parameter getter, the description covers the setting's role, importance, and default value. It does not enumerate possible values (e.g., 0/1) but the context 'normally left ON' and type 'UINT8' imply the range. Overall adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist; baseline is 4. The description adds value by explaining the purpose and default of the setting, which is sufficient context for a parameterless tool.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies this as a getter for the pid_at_min_throttle setting, explains its function (keeps PIDs active at idle), and distinguishes it from the 'set_pid_at_min_throttle' sibling. The verb 'Get' and resource name make the purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance is provided. The description gives context ('Required for airmode to function correctly; normally left ON') but does not compare with alternatives or specify scenarios. Usage is implied but not directed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.