set_tpa_curve_pid_thr100

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Discloses scaling, default value, and prerequisite feature. Does not mention side effects or persistence, but provides useful behavioral context beyond the schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence plus a note and type annotation. Every element is necessary; no fluff or redundancy. Highly efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Sufficient for a simple setter with one parameter. Covers purpose, scaling, default, and prerequisite. Lacks mention of possible side effects or interaction with other TPA settings, but overall complete enough for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 100% coverage of parameter 'value' with type and range. Description adds scaling factor (×0.1%), default interpretation (70=7%), and unit context, adding meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool sets the PID value at full throttle for the TPA curve, with scaling (×0.1%) and default. It distinguishes from siblings like set_tpa_curve_pid_thr0 by specifying full throttle context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Mentions the prerequisite USE_ADVANCED_TPA feature but does not explicitly contrast with sibling tools (e.g., set_tpa_curve_pid_thr0) or provide when-to-use vs when-not-to-use guidance. Adequate but lacks exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.