get_blackbox_disable_gyrounfilt

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden. It implies a read-only operation via 'Get' and gives the data type and default value. However, it does not disclose idempotency, side effects, or error conditions, which would be expected for a complete behavioral description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is very short (two sentences) and efficient. However, the first sentence restates the tool name, which is slightly redundant. Otherwise, it is concise and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no parameters and no output schema, the description is minimal. It does not explain the return value format, possible values, or how 'gyrounfilt' differs from 'gyro'. Lacks context about its role in the blackbox system.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has no parameters (100% coverage), so baseline is 3. The description adds nothing about parameters (none exist) but does provide type and default info relevant to the return value, which is helpful but not required for parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Get blackbox_disable_gyrounfilt' and explains what the setting does ('Exclude unfiltered gyro data'). The verb 'Get' and resource name are clear. However, it does not differentiate from many sibling get_blackbox_disable_* tools beyond the specific parameter name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_blackbox_disable_gyro or set_blackbox_disable_gyrounfilt. No prerequisites, context, or usage scenarios are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.