set_dterm_lpf1_dyn_max_hz

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description must cover behavioral traits. It indicates a write operation ('Set') and provides the data type (UINT16) and default (150), but does not disclose side effects (e.g., whether changes take effect immediately, require reboot, or affect flight behavior). The schema's wide min/max range is not contextualized.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence plus contextual hints, which is efficient. It front-loads the main purpose. However, the 'AOS tune: 110 Hz' note may be jargon that could be clarified, but it does not significantly harm conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple setter tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description provides the parameter's meaning, units, default, and a typical value. This is adequate but does not explain the broader filter context or what 'dterm_lpf1_dyn' relates to, which might be needed for a new user. No contradictions with annotations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides only a bare description ('Value for dterm_lpf1_dyn_max_hz (UINT16)'). The tool description adds meaningful context: it is a maximum cutoff frequency at full throttle, gives a tuning example (110 Hz), and states the default (150). This helps the agent understand the parameter's role and typical values.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it sets a parameter (dterm_lpf1_dyn_max_hz) and describes it as 'Dynamic D-term LPF1 maximum cutoff (at full throttle).' This is a specific verb+resource. While it doesn't explicitly differentiate from similar sibling tools like set_dterm_lpf1_dyn_min_hz, the name and context make the purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, appropriate contexts, or when not to use it. The description only gives an example tuning value (110 Hz) but no decision criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.