get_failsafe_throttle

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Despite no annotations, the description explains the behavioral context: it applies in Landing Mode Stage 2, as Stage 1 fallback, and has a specific requirement for GPS Rescue. It also states the default value (1000 = motors off). This goes beyond a simple 'get'.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence that front-loads the purpose and adds critical usage details without fluff. Every part adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and no annotations, the description covers the key aspects: roles, default, and GPS Rescue implication. It could mention whether the value is read from hardware or config, but overall it is sufficiently complete for a simple uint16 parameter.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has no parameters (100% coverage), so the description does not need parameter details. However, it still adds value by specifying the return type and default in brackets [UINT16, default: 1000], which aids understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves the failsafe throttle value and specifies its roles in Landing Mode Stage 2 and as Stage 1 fallback. It also includes domain-specific context like GPS Rescue implications, distinguishing it from other get_* tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied from the context (failsafe, landing, GPS Rescue), but no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., get_failsafe_throttle_low_delay) is provided. The description does not exclude other scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.