set_blackbox_disable_pids

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must fully disclose behavior. It mentions logging exclusion and log size reduction but contradicts the schema by claiming '[UINT32]' when the parameter is a string enum. No disclosure of persistence, side effects, or permissions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short but includes redundant repetition of the tool name. It could be more efficient by removing 'Set blackbox_disable_pids:' and directly stating the effect. Not overly long, but not optimally concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple toggle setting, the description omits critical context: the effect of ON vs OFF values, whether the setting persists, and return behavior. Given many sibling tools, this level of detail is insufficient for correct usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% but the description adds a default value 'OFF' (useful) while incorrectly stating the type as '[UINT32]' (misleading). The schema already defines the parameter with an enum, so the description adds minimal value and introduces confusion.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool excludes PID data from logs and reduces log size, using specific verb 'Set' and resource 'blackbox_disable_pids'. It distinguishes from sibling tools by explicitly mentioning 'PID data'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., set_blackbox_disable_acc, etc.). It simply states what it does without context or conditions for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.