get_usb_hid_cdc

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It reveals the data type (UINT8) and default value (OFF), adding transparency. As a read operation, no side effects need disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise: one explanatory sentence plus bracketed metadata. It is front-loaded with the tool name and action, with no redundant words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple getter with no parameters and no output schema, the description is complete. It explains the setting, when it is needed, and the value type/default, leaving no ambiguity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has no parameters (100% coverage vacuously). The description adds semantic value by specifying the return type and default in brackets, which is beyond the empty schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves the USB HID CDC setting, using a specific verb+resource pattern. It explains the setting's purpose (combined HID+CDC vs pure CDC) and distinguishes it from the sibling 'set_usb_hid_cdc' tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions 'Required for some OTG hosts', providing context on when the setting is relevant, but does not explicitly state when to use this getter versus alternatives like 'set_usb_hid_cdc'. The usage is implied rather than clearly guided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.