get_rpm_limit_p

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description partially compensates by indicating a read operation with data type/range/default. Missing details on error behavior when USE_RPM_LIMIT is disabled or safety implications.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: one sentence for purpose, one parenthetical for requirement and data format. No wordiness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no parameters and no output schema, the description provides essential info (purpose, prerequisite, type/range/default). Could improve by clarifying return format or distinguishing from get_rpm_limit_value.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters in schema (trivially 100% coverage), so baseline is 4. Description adds value with range '[0–100]' and default '25', which is not in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'rpm_limit_p: P gain for RPM limiter controller', differentiating it from its set counterpart among siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description notes the prerequisite 'Requires: USE_RPM_LIMIT', implying when to use. However, it lacks explicit guidance on when not to use this tool versus alternatives like set_rpm_limit_p.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.