set_gyro_lpf1_dyn_expo

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so description carries the burden. It specifies the setting is a UINT8 range 0–10 with default 5, and explains the effect on rise speed. However, it does not disclose side effects (e.g., immediate application, persistence across reboots, impact on flight behavior). For a flight controller parameter, these are relevant but not critical.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is extremely concise: two short sentences plus a clear metadata tag. No unnecessary words. Front-loaded with the purpose and effect.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter setter with a corresponding getter and no output schema, the description covers range, default, and effect. It could mention that the value is stored persistently or that a reboot is not required, but given the tool's simplicity, it is nearly complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema provides 100% coverage with description, but description adds meaning: it explains the expo curve shaping concept and the effect of higher values. The inline metadata '[UINT8, 0–10, default: 5]' reinforces constraints. This goes beyond the schema's generic 'Value for...' line.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it sets the expo curve shaping for dynamic LPF1 cutoff vs throttle with 'higher = faster rise'. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'set_gyro_lpf1_dyn_max_hz' (frequency) or 'set_dterm_lpf1_dyn_expo' (for D-term). However, it does not explicitly differentiate from all other set_* tools, but the name and context are sufficient.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this vs alternatives like get_gyro_lpf1_dyn_expo for reading. The description implies it is for tuning gyro filter response, but does not mention when to avoid or prerequisites. It would benefit from mentioning that this should be used in conjunction with related gyro filter parameters.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.