create_uib_page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already convey read/write nature. The description adds 'with route registration' which is a minor behavioral detail. However, it does not disclose side effects, ordering, or the response format. Lacks depth beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise single-sentence description that front-loads the core action. No unnecessary words. The optional '[Write]' tag is minimal and does not detract.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of an output schema, the description should mention the return value (e.g., the created page's sys_id). Also lacks prerequisites or post-conditions. Incomplete for an agent to fully understand the tool's operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All four parameters have descriptions in the input schema (100% coverage). The tool description does not add further meaning to the parameters beyond stating route registration. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb ('Create'), resource ('UI Builder page'), and includes the key detail of route registration. It distinguishes from sibling tools like create_uib_component and create_uib_data_broker by specifying the resource type.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use or when not to use, nor alternatives mentioned. For a create tool, usage is partially implied, but could benefit from noting prerequisites like requiring an existing app or that update_uib_page is for modifications.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.