create_solution_package

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations provide only basic flags (readOnlyHint=false, etc.). The description adds '[Write]' which is redundant given the annotation. No further behavioral details like permissions, side effects, or reversibility are disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and to the point, with no wasted words. It front-loads the action and resource effectively.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (3 params, no output schema, mutation), the description lacks essential context about side effects, return format, or post-creation state. It fails to compensate for sparse annotations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 67% (2 of 3 params have descriptions). The description does not elaborate on parameter meaning beyond the schema; for example, it doesn't clarify what 'name' or 'update_sets' represent in context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a solution package from selected update sets for distribution', specifying the verb, resource, and source. It distinguishes from sibling tools like create_update_set and export_update_set by targeting a higher-level package.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidance is provided. The description does not indicate when to use this tool versus alternatives like export_update_set or create_update_set, nor does it mention prerequisites or context for effective use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.