update_uib_page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds only '[Write]', which is redundant given annotations (readOnlyHint=false). It fails to disclose other behaviors like auth requirements, rate limits, or side effects beyond what annotations already provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Although short, the description is overly terse and omits essential information. It is not effectively structured to aid agent understanding.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 4 parameters, no output schema, and a brief description, the tool lacks critical context. The agent cannot infer return values, expected behavior, or full usage scope.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is only 25% (only sys_id described). The description does not add any meaning to the parameters (path, title, layout), leaving the agent to guess their types or constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb ('Update') and resource ('UI Builder page'), distinguishing it from related tools like create_uib_page and delete_uib_page. However, it is very brief and lacks additional context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., create_uib_page or update_record). The description does not mention prerequisites or scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.